Advanced Search
July 14, 2022
Find out more about the briefings in this series below:
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) invites you to view a briefing on how the federal government as well as states and cities around the country can better incorporate equity into emergency management. Climate change is driving more frequent and severe impacts such as polar vortices, sea level rise, wildfires, and extreme heat, which were covered in EESI’s Living with Climate Change briefing series. When disaster strikes, underserved communities are often hit hardest and longest. Ensuring that equity is incorporated into all aspects of emergency management—from preparedness to response to recovery—creates more resilient communities that are better able to live with climate change.
Panelists discussed the steps that Congress can take to more comprehensively integrate equity into emergency management, including how to ensure that large federal investments such as the ones in the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act do not cause harm to communities.
This briefing is part of a series called Living with Climate Change that ran through July and focused on strategies, policies, and programs preparing communities around the country for four major climate threats: polar vortices, sea level rise, wildfires, extreme heat, and integrating equity into emergency management.
The series ran in parallel with another briefing series, Scaling Up Innovation to Drive Down Emissions, covering hydrogen, direct air capture, offshore wind, electric vehicle infrastructure build-out, and how start-up accelerators can drive climate action.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Chauncia Willis, Co-Founder and CEO, Institute for Diversity and Inclusion in Emergency Management (I-DIEM)
Chief Shirell Parfait-Dardar, Traditional Tribal Chief, The Grand Caillou/Dulac Band of Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw in Louisiana
Q&A:
Q: How have I-DIEM and the Grand Caillou/Dulac Tribe worked together to address the aftermath of Hurricane Ida?
Parfait-Dardar
Willis
Q: In what ways do you see emergency managers and community leaders thinking about pre-disaster mitigation as opposed to being entirely focused on during-disaster response and post-disaster recovery? How, if at all, do you see these shifts in thinking presenting an opportunity to make adaptation, resilience, and disaster response more equitable?
Q: Have state and federal agencies supported traditional ecological knowledge in their deployment of nature-based solutions to address climate impacts?
Q: What do you think the impact of the Justice40 Initiative will be on emergency response at the community level, if any?
Q: Federal agencies have a lot of work to do to center equity in their work. What sorts of reforms could they undertake that would be most impactful for the communities you work with? Are there ways that federal agencies could more inclusively incorporate input from those communities?
Compiled by Christina Pelliccio and edited for clarity and length. This is not a transcript.