Advanced Search
July 6, 2012
Representative Frank Lucas (R-OK), Chair of the House Committee on Agriculture, and Representative Collin Peterson (D-MN), the ranking member, have introduced their draft of the next Farm Bill. It would provide no mandatory funding for rural bioenergy or other renewable energy programs.
On July 5, the chair and ranking member released their "discussion draft" of the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act (FARRM) , a bill to reauthorize the nation’s nutritional assistance, food, conservation, and agriculture programs for the next five years, 2013-2017. You can read a summary of it here . The Agriculture Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on July 11. The current Farm Bill expires September 30.
The rural energy programs in Title IX of past Farm Bills have constituted a very small fraction of the total spending in the bill – less than one percent. However, when this relatively small public investment has been compounded by much larger, matching private investments, then the impact of these programs becomes much more significant, advancing job creation, economic development, environmental quality, and energy security. A little federal investment has gone a long way.
The following chart offers a comparison between the 2008 Farm Bill authorization for energy programs , the Senate-passed 2012 Farm Bill , the House discussion draft, and the energy title marker bill (H.R. 5955) introduced by Representative Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) ( See our June 22 SBFF post ).
*Such Sums as Necessary
Almost all of the money that was invested in energy programs over the past five years under the current 2008 Farm Bill was mandatory funding. Very little of the discretionary funding that was authorized in the 2008 Farm Bill was actually appropriated by the appropriations committee. Prospects for future annual appropriations of discretionary funds are even bleaker. If progress in rural bioenergy and other energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives is to continue, mandatory funding is key.