Advanced Search
August 7, 2020
2020 RENEWABLE ENERGY & ENERGY EFFICIENCY EXPO
On July 30, 2020, the 23rd Annual Congressional Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency EXPO and Policy Forum brought together 25 businesses, trade associations, and government agencies to showcase clean energy industries. The bipartisan House and Senate Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucuses served as the EXPO's honorary co-hosts, and the event was held online because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The fourth panel of the day, "Efficient Buildings as Energy Grid Resources," focused on the building sector, which is underappreciated for its ability to contribute to carbon emission reductions on a near-immediate basis. Indeed, a building retrofit can be described in a nutshell: one day, inefficient and leaky; the next day, energy-efficient, comfortable, and productive. Increasingly, efficient buildings have the ability to communicate and respond to conditions on the energy grid.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island), who is the Co-Chair of the Senate Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus, provided prerecorded introductory remarks.
View the full panel video above, or read the highlights below.
Introductory Remarks [prerecorded]: U.S. Senator Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
David Nemtzow, Director, Building Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy
Becca Trietch, Administrator, Energy Efficiency Programs, Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources
Justin Koscher, President, Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Association (PIMA)
Keith Dennis, Vice President, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA)
David Nemtzow, Director, Building Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Q&A
Question: The U.S. Energy Information Administration reported that in April, the United States consumed a total of 600 quadrillion BTUs, which is the lowest amount of energy consumption since 1989. While this is due to the coronavirus crisis, what is the role of energy efficiency as we try to make buildings more comfortable?
David Nemtzow: Energy usage is down, but the pandemic also means that energy usage has shifted from commercial usage to residential usage, as people are working from home due to COVID-19. In many commercial buildings, energy usage is not down as proportionally as we would like because energy is still being used. For example, in the building where I work the thermostat was still at 70 degrees, even though it was empty.
It is still too early to determine the near-term consequences of COVID-19 to commercial buildings and their usage, and so it is important not to make hasty decisions in the short-term. In the long-term, climate change is a big reason to make changes to our buildings to improve the environment, save energy, and reduce energy in commercial buildings.
Becca Trietch: More controls and data in buildings should be encouraged in these uncertain times. Now is the time to change building envelope systems in buildings that are unoccupied due to COVID-19. We can improve indoor air quality, which is an important element to prevent the spread of COVID-19, through energy efficiency and HVAC fixes in buildings.
Justin Koscher: Making a building more energy efficient allows it to protect the building’s occupants.
Keith Dennis: Due to COVID-19, people are at home more often, which means that they are using more energy at home, which they need to pay for (they did not need to pay for the commercial energy used at their workplace). This means that their energy bills are going up. How are people going to pay their energy bills? There are affordability issues. We need to find ways to reduce energy usage for these people.
Question: Should building improvements be part of the infrastructure discussion at the federal level and should we prioritize some over others?
David Nemtzow: From a DOE perspective: yes, to all your questions in several respects. If we use energy in a more efficient way, then the grid is more reliable and efficient. Building improvement work is often job intensive, and so through building improvements, jobs are created.
Justin Koscher: We have built most of the buildings that will be around for the next 50 years. Talking about existing building stock is important. Making public buildings, like federal buildings, more energy efficient can help save money for the government and for taxpayers. It can also create jobs and help deploy technology measures, bringing down their costs.
Becca Trietch: Improving the energy efficiency of buildings is important, because it can create societal impacts for our health and our wallets.
Keith Dennis: Investments in improving the energy efficiency of buildings should be considered not just at the component level, but should also be considered at the system-wide level.
Question: What should the regulatory decisions regarding time-of-use rates be? [time-of-use electricity rates change depending on the time of day and season]
David Nemtzow: Time-of-use rates are determined by states and utilities, and are not a federal policy, so the DOE has no view on the matter. Even though I, personally, would like to see more time-of-use rates, I don't think it's necessary. Price is not included in every decision made by consumers. Policies can reflect the value of energy during different times of the day. Renewable energy portfolio standards and energy efficiency portfolio standards can be modified without needing to tackle the issue of retail price.
Becca Trietch: Time-of-use rates are important, but demand response programs must be used in conjunction with them for them to work properly. However, there are barriers to demand response. First, there has to be the infrastructure in place, and not all customers have advanced meter infrastructure in their homes and businesses to enjoy the benefits of demand response. Second, technology has to be widely available. Not everyone has WiFi thermostats or battery storage devices in their homes. Access to the technology has to be optimized to reduce the costs.
Keith Dennis: It's a little too easy to oversimplify rates and to jump to them as a solution. First, we need to install demand-response technologies, but most Americans cannot afford such technologies (most Americans cannot afford an emergency involving more than $400). We need innovative financing mechanisms to help households adopt technologies. For example, a utility could provide a new water heater to a household (free of charge or at a discounted rate) in exchange for the right to use it as a demand-response tool. Moreover, not all utilities are the same: some have access to nuclear power, which costs the same throughout the year (so a time-of-use rate wouldn’t make sense).
Justin Koscher: From a commercial building perspective, there are policy options that can help building envelope retrofits. There are policy tools that can overcome accessibility barriers. One of these tools is the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program, which is a financing tool that supports energy efficiency retrofits, particularly in large commercial buildings.
Compiled by Miguel Yanez